This set of webpages is my attempt to organize my notes on early Russian clothing. As such, it is a work-in-progress and the information is often incomplete and sometimes contradictory. It is published "on-line" as an invitation for others to share information that I don't have (Thank you!) and to help others who are treading the same ground I already have.
It may seem repetitive at times, when I have a paragraph about an item based on Pushkareva, followed by a paragraph with slightly different information from Stamerov. But I have found it useful to carefully indicate where the different information came from, so I can double check it later or make judgements based on the reliability of the source.
Since the terminology of ancient clothing is often controversial, authors frequently seem to use different terms for the same garment. This is why I set up the "layers" system of organization, so that similar garments being used in similar ways would be discussed on the same page for comparison. The terms svita and shuba are an example of women's garments that have a lot of similarities and may (or may not) be overlapping terms. (I've noticed that Russian researchers tend to be splitters rather than lumpers.)
Fabrics and Furs Colors and Dyes Garment Construction Decoration and Ornament Jewelry Collars, Cuffs, Voshvy, Borders Belts, Purses, Gloves, Mittens Footwear Relevant Notes on Muscovite Rus
Clothing in early Rus', as in other cultures, reflected societal norms, and the individual's originality and conception of beauty, and indicated rank, wealth, profession, family status and locality. (Pushkareva97)
Rus had close political, economic, and cultural ties with the Byzantine empire which had a noticeable (but fiercely debated) affect on the form of clothing in Ancient Rus, particulalry for the upper classes. At the same time, Rus was not isolated from Europe, the controversial Viking origin of the Rus rulers, the interaction with Finnish neighbors in the north, and trade with Western Europe meant that clothing in Rus was not completely isolated from styles in the rest of Europe.
The climate of Rus was fairly cool. Long winters and cool summers made closed up clothing with many layers and furs practical. (Kireyeva)
Thinness and pallor were signs of illness, mean behavior, bad habits or depravity. The similarity between blednost (pallor) and bliadstvo (harlotry) was noted in ecclesiastical texts. So, in contrast, Russian women wished to have bright red cheeks "like the color of poppies", white skin "like white snow", clear lustrous eyes "like a falcon", and black eyebrows "like a sable's tail". (Pushkareva97) and (Kireyeva).
A woman's inner dignity and emotional restraint were emphasized without restricting freedom of movement. Depictions of period women showed them to be stately and filled with inner tranquility and confidence. (Pushkareva97)
The most conspicuous part of costume of peasant women of the pre-Mongol period was the headdress (venets for maidens and kika for married women), and also its ornaments - temple rings, whose form could be used to identify the origin of its owner. (Pushkareva89)
Peasants wore earrings, beads, priveski, copper bracelets and perstni (ring with stone) and lapti on their feet. (Pushkareva89)
The outer dress was made shorter than the lower garment and had wider sleeves. The hem and cuffs of the lower garment always were visible, forming a stepped silhouette. As in the costume of peasants, a belt was added. (Pushkareva89)
The headdress of city dwellers of all classes (koruny for maidens and kiki with povoyami for married women) in form had much in common with peasants, which were determined by its rural origin, however decorating was complex, intricate. Kolty on ryasnakh ("duckweed" chains) served long as ornaments of headdresses of city dwellers, while the necks of city dwellers were surrounded by metal grivny and necklaces of beads. Boyarinas and princesses wore massive folding silver bracelets over their sleeves at wrist and forearm; city dwellers a bit more poor were content with different-colored glass. (Pushkareva89)
In distinction from peasants - city dwellers and the representatives of the ruling class were "all in boots". The leather shoes of the 10-13th cent. including porshni, soft shoes, "half boots" and boots without heel and stiff base, were cut simply and crudely, but then brightly colored. (Pushkareva89)
In the garb of noble city dwellers, princesses and boyarinas were used expensive, most often imported, fabrics. Of velvety aksamite were sewn open-down-the-front (raspashnye) clothes of a type of dress with a clasp on the right shoulder - part of the holiday clothes of princesses. (Pushkareva89)
In general, the garments of princesses and boyarinas had more detail than those of the lower classes. (Pushkareva97) The clothing of the representatives of the feudal nobility also had more items in each of the types of clothing, and the costume was built of a greater number of components. (Pushkareva89)
Aristocratic ceremonial clothing also demonstrated wealth with multicolored cloth, silver and gold embroidery and expensive furs. One princess owned a red coat lined with fox fur when a single fox pelt worth was more than a silver ruble - a year's pay for a peasant. (Pushkareva97)
The garments of representatives of the priviledged class, even those not intended for celebratory situations and holiday appearances, were richly decorated. Several examples are found in a miniature from the Izbornik of Svyatoslav of 1073. One princess wears a loose straight dress with wide long sleeves, supplied with naruchami [cuffs]. The dress is belted; conforming in color to the naruchej and the belt appears to have been "zatkan" (woven) with gold embroidery. The bottom of the dress is decorated with a border (kajma), and the top - with a round turned down collar. A dress with a shoulder collar (ozherl'ya-oplech'e) with such decoration can be seen in other miniature portrayals, and in a 1270 Gospel. (Pushkareva89)
Fine imported fabrics (pavolok) were reserved for outer garments and festival costumes. The main imported fabrics were taffeta, brocade, stamped velvet, golden velvet (velvet embroidered with gold thread). (Kireyeva)
Fur was used extensively. Winter clothes were lined with it, and trims and edgings were made of it. Peasants used wolf, fox, bear, rabbit, squirrel and especially sheepskin. Nobility enjoyed beaver, otter, sable, and marten. (Stamerov)
The rubakha seems to have served as the only underwear for women, although 19th century peasant women reportedly wore simple undertrousers. So perhaps medieval Russian women did also, although I have seen no discussion of it in my references so far.
More information about the rubakha
The zanaviska or zapona was worn by maidens over the rubakha, and was even more ancient than the panova. It was a type of linen "naramnik" which was a long rectangular length of fabric folded in half at the shoulders and with a round neck-opening. It could be various lengths, but was shorter than the rubakha worn under it. (It looks much like a tabard.)
The navershnik was even older than the zanaviska. It was a calf-length tunic with short broad sleeves. On holidays, the navershnik was worn over the zapona or the panova. Compare with the dalmatica and letnik below.
Neither the panova, the zanaviska, nor the navershnik were required components of ancient Russian costume. The rubakha was often the sole attire of a peasant woman.
"Jackets" - Over the rubakha and the wrap skirt, and under their coats or cloaks, women could wear garments of various lengths and styles, made of wool, cotton, or even velvet (for the rich), short and wide to the waist or long in front with narrow wrist-length sleeves.
More information about the panova and zapona.
Under coats or cloaks, women wore jackets of different types, short and wide to the waist or long in front with narrow wrist-length sleeves.
Later in period, women started to wear the graceful, wide-sleeved letnik. This garment, particularly in its earliest forms, strongly resembles the dalmatika.
The kortelya was a fur-lined version of the letnik.
More information about the garments in layer three.
The shuba is possibly the same as the svita.
Some of these garments were (somewhat) fitted to the waist, others started widening/flaring outward just under the arms.
The odnoryadka and opashen were worn later in this period and had sleeves that were as long as the hem of the garment. There were slits in the upper part of the sleeves to let the arms out. Such garments could, thus, be worn over the letnik.
More information about the garments in layer four.
The nobility often wore a small Byzantine/Roman-style cloak called a korzna. It resembled the chlamys and was rectangular or semicircular in cut. It could worn fastened by a fibula, brooch or buckle on the right shoulder or in the middle of the chest (a "cloak-mantiyu) and hung down to the ground in wide pleats, sometimes gathered at the waist with a belt.
More information about the garments in layer five.
The cloak-cape was long preserved in the costume of ancient Russian women in celebratory clothing. Comparing the Radzivillovski Chronicle with frescos of Sophia Cathedral of Kiev, indicates that the over garment was loose and long, consisting of a straight, usually belted, dress (the so-called dalmatica?), supplemented with "raspashnym" clothing (robes open-down-the-front, often worn over the shoulders like a cloak), a collar, a "podol" (hem) and a "styk" (joint?) of fabric which was otorocheny (edged) with a border (kajma). On frescoes of St. Sophia's in Kiev, the women were dressed in just such dresses and edged cloaks (plashi). Sometimes, that edge or border was sewn on as a wide silk braid, embroidered with gold. Galloon/braids of such type are found in burials. (Pushkarva89)
Coarse wool fabric was called "vlasyanitsy" (hairshirt); monks and nuns wore it directly on the body as a form of self-torture. (Pushkareva89)
At the beginning of the 10th century especially, noble costume was ornamented with kolti, beads, nachilniki, and sequins. (Stamerov) Earrings were not particularly common from the 10th-13th centuries, but bracelets, rings, beads and necklaces were. The majority of jewelry was made of metal. Peasant jewelry was of copper, bronze or low-grade silver. Noble jewelry was of silver, and sometimes gold. (Stamerov) Jewelers techniques included pearlwork, silverwork, filigree and enamel. (Kireyeva)
Small embossed coins, engravings, stampings, castings, zern (solder for making tiny metal grains), filigree, and black and partitioned enamel were among the techniques mastered in Kiev. (Stamerov) Tin sequins of various forms were sewn in ornamental bands and stripes on the yoke, etc. of clothing and frequently had gems attached to them. (Stamerov)
Jewelry was often designed for individual commissions. Gold and silver jewelry with precious and semiprecious stones was often passed down for many generations. (Pushkareva97)
Jewelry Page
Eugenia Tolmochoff proposed that the heavy use of makeup was for modesty, corresponding to the Oriental use of the veil to conceal the face. She also noted that, according to Ivan Zabelin, the fashion for makeup was brought to Russia from Constantinople by Princess Olga in the 10th century. (Tolmachoff)
According to Rabinovich, very durable turned out to be the manner of women’s abuse of cosmetics – whiting, antimony, etc. This was noticed already in the 16th cent. by Fletcher, explaining in his own way the bad natural color of the face of Russian women. He wrote, that whiting covered the face of women completely, and antimony wore the eyes, and brows. “From terrible women they turn into beautiful dolls”. “Whiting, rouge and antimony,” V.G. Belinskij wrote 2 ½ centuries later, in 1845, about Moscow petty bourgeoisie. Similar information appeared in the Geographic Society for several northern Russian cities in the middle of the 19th cent. (Rabinovich, 13-17th)
For more information see Brief Notes on Muscovite Rus Clothing.
For noble city dwellers, boyarinas, princesses instead of the gown (dalmatika?) appeared letniki, "koreli", "opashni". In cold autumn or winter day they wore kozhukhi and shuby ("sheepskin coat" and "fur coat"), which in rich families now lay beneath bright expensive fabrics. (Pushkareva89)
In the 15th cent. cloaks and capes were used more rarely, and together with changes of form clothing was changed and also the set of its traditional supplements/additions. Fibuly became also a completely rare ornament. But the belt remained a necessary accessory of women's clothing. (Pushkareva89)
The shoes of Marfa Boretski and her noble contemporaries (end 15th cent.) became significantly more complex in cut and design with openwork appearing, along with composite manufacture. Porshni completely went out of use; everyday shoes became more comfortable in construction. In the 14-15th cent. half boot and boots with little composition leather heels on a stiff base gained the widest spread as the favorite shoes of city dwellers and princesses and boyarinas. (Pushkareva89)
Brief Notes on Muscovite Rus Clothing.
COPYRIGHT (c) 1997-2007 by Lisa Kies. You may make copies for personal use and to distribute for educational purposes but only if the article remains complete and entire with original authorship clearly noted.